🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.